<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conceptual Highlighting in Electronic Text</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seobythesea.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=249</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing and Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Services, Consulting, and Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:42:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnon.com  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; New Jersey Web Designers Part 2, plus CopyWriters!</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=249#comment-3272</link>
		<dc:creator>johnon.com  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; New Jersey Web Designers Part 2, plus CopyWriters!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=249#comment-3272</guid>
		<description>[...] ed about it a lot on the New Jersey transit train), so of course I knew the Chesapeake. So Bill just noted a new patent on search that offers a way to scan text and highlight &#8220;relevant&#8221; port [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ed about it a lot on the New Jersey transit train), so of course I knew the Chesapeake. So Bill just noted a new patent on search that offers a way to scan text and highlight &#8220;relevant&#8221; port [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Slawski</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=249#comment-3268</link>
		<dc:creator>William Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=249#comment-3268</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

After all of the posts I&#039;ve read of yours at threadwatch, I was hoping that you had a blog of your own somewhere.  Thanks for a link to it.

It&#039;s hard not to look at something like this with two different hats on.  One hat as a searcher who might be interested in finding information, and another as someone who studies search engines, and tries to understand how they do what they do.

Patents aren&#039;t always revolutionary.  More often, they are a way of taking something that exists, and attempting to add to it something else that other people aren&#039;t doing.  This seems to add at least two different things to the highlighting that a Google already does:

1. Some way to find information related to keywords, in addition to those keywords, or;

2. information that may match a user profile or that may be related to prior search history.

These aren&#039;t giant steps, but they also aren&#039;t things that people are doing now.  And while big changes do spring up sometimes, often they come about from smaller changes over time.

I&#039;m not convinced that this is the best way to collect user interests though.  Maybe an &lt;a href=&quot;http://web.media.mit.edu/~hugo/publications/papers/BP2005-hugo-interestmap.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Interestmap&lt;/a&gt; (pdf), combined with that profile and search history is the next big step.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>After all of the posts I&#8217;ve read of yours at threadwatch, I was hoping that you had a blog of your own somewhere.  Thanks for a link to it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard not to look at something like this with two different hats on.  One hat as a searcher who might be interested in finding information, and another as someone who studies search engines, and tries to understand how they do what they do.</p>
<p>Patents aren&#8217;t always revolutionary.  More often, they are a way of taking something that exists, and attempting to add to it something else that other people aren&#8217;t doing.  This seems to add at least two different things to the highlighting that a Google already does:</p>
<p>1. Some way to find information related to keywords, in addition to those keywords, or;</p>
<p>2. information that may match a user profile or that may be related to prior search history.</p>
<p>These aren&#8217;t giant steps, but they also aren&#8217;t things that people are doing now.  And while big changes do spring up sometimes, often they come about from smaller changes over time.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not convinced that this is the best way to collect user interests though.  Maybe an <a href="http://web.media.mit.edu/~hugo/publications/papers/BP2005-hugo-interestmap.pdf">Interestmap</a> (pdf), combined with that profile and search history is the next big step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=249#comment-3267</link>
		<dc:creator>John Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=249#comment-3267</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.. sure sounds fancy, but is it really more than a better way to highlight matches such as Google does in the cache pages?  Sure you can dream of extending that, but for a practical purpose? Ithink that will definitely be the &quot;hard part&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.. sure sounds fancy, but is it really more than a better way to highlight matches such as Google does in the cache pages?  Sure you can dream of extending that, but for a practical purpose? Ithink that will definitely be the &#8220;hard part&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Slawski</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=249#comment-3206</link>
		<dc:creator>William Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 05:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=249#comment-3206</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, Yuri.  Some amazing stuff, indeed.  I can see that &quot;I am feeling lucky&quot; button bringing different results for different people sometime sooner rather than later.

Some of the stuff I think about when I see something like this is:

1.  Will it happen, and when will we be able to use it?

2. Should it be something that we think about as we build pages?  How might be take something like this into consideration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, Yuri.  Some amazing stuff, indeed.  I can see that &#8220;I am feeling lucky&#8221; button bringing different results for different people sometime sooner rather than later.</p>
<p>Some of the stuff I think about when I see something like this is:</p>
<p>1.  Will it happen, and when will we be able to use it?</p>
<p>2. Should it be something that we think about as we build pages?  How might be take something like this into consideration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuri</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=249#comment-3202</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 02:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=249#comment-3202</guid>
		<description>It is amazing how detailed the search engines can get with analyzing and showing data. I wonder how far we are from totally relying on the &quot;I am feeling lucky&quot; button.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is amazing how detailed the search engines can get with analyzing and showing data. I wonder how far we are from totally relying on the &#8220;I am feeling lucky&#8221; button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
