<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Approach to Making Online Ratings Easier&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seobythesea.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=2949</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing and Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Services, Consulting, and Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:42:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Slawski</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=2949#comment-242146</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=2949#comment-242146</guid>
		<description>Hi Sean,

The kind of reviews mentioned in this patent aren&#039;t associated with particular sites, but appear that they would be made directly to Google.  Would that make a difference in how you feel about them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sean,</p>
<p>The kind of reviews mentioned in this patent aren&#8217;t associated with particular sites, but appear that they would be made directly to Google.  Would that make a difference in how you feel about them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=2949#comment-241763</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=2949#comment-241763</guid>
		<description>Now the major problem I have with this, and why I think it is completely useless, is because of how google ranks review sources.  Even if you could tweet local reviews through, I don&#039;t know Google Buzz, you still would not be given that much weight.  

The reason is that Google only takes into account reviews from specific sites, all of which are pay sites.  These sites determine a product ranking on Google product search.  The biggest one taken into account, why Google Checkout of course. So this will be just another kind of hook (or more likely attempt) to have Google integrate into social networking, but will never affect your rankings for products.  It sounds lame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now the major problem I have with this, and why I think it is completely useless, is because of how google ranks review sources.  Even if you could tweet local reviews through, I don&#8217;t know Google Buzz, you still would not be given that much weight.  </p>
<p>The reason is that Google only takes into account reviews from specific sites, all of which are pay sites.  These sites determine a product ranking on Google product search.  The biggest one taken into account, why Google Checkout of course. So this will be just another kind of hook (or more likely attempt) to have Google integrate into social networking, but will never affect your rankings for products.  It sounds lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Slawski</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=2949#comment-213969</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=2949#comment-213969</guid>
		<description>Hi Victor,

Yes, I think there are.  I remember one of the first novels that I read growing up was about a dystopia.  We really do need to take books like 1984 seriously as warnings of where we could be headed if we aren&#039;t careful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Victor,</p>
<p>Yes, I think there are.  I remember one of the first novels that I read growing up was about a dystopia.  We really do need to take books like 1984 seriously as warnings of where we could be headed if we aren&#8217;t careful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=2949#comment-213889</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=2949#comment-213889</guid>
		<description>I suppose their are many way&#039;s to create an antiutopia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose their are many way&#8217;s to create an antiutopia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Slawski</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=2949#comment-208808</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 03:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=2949#comment-208808</guid>
		<description>Hi Victor,

Good to see you.  This patent filing does allow for people uploading audio, images, and video with reviews, but doesn&#039;t go so far as to say that they might capture peoples&#039; reactions to information.  At least not in the way that a Microsoft patent I wrote about a couple of years ago does.  From my post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=961&quot;&gt;Bill Gates and Company Want to Watch You Watch TV, Buy Groceries, and Use Your Credit Cards and Cell Phone (and Take Notes)&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Reactions of a user to information — Collected by cameras, microphones, and/or systems that sense biometric information. The look on your face, the sound of your voice, the emotions that you express when buying something or presented with information could be &quot;recorded, processed, and fed back for analysis to affect the type of advertising presented to the user when s/he goes online.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I hope that we don&#039;t see something like that come about, but I would guess that it&#039;s a possibility some time in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Victor,</p>
<p>Good to see you.  This patent filing does allow for people uploading audio, images, and video with reviews, but doesn&#8217;t go so far as to say that they might capture peoples&#8217; reactions to information.  At least not in the way that a Microsoft patent I wrote about a couple of years ago does.  From my post <a href="http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=961">Bill Gates and Company Want to Watch You Watch TV, Buy Groceries, and Use Your Credit Cards and Cell Phone (and Take Notes)</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Reactions of a user to information — Collected by cameras, microphones, and/or systems that sense biometric information. The look on your face, the sound of your voice, the emotions that you express when buying something or presented with information could be &#8220;recorded, processed, and fed back for analysis to affect the type of advertising presented to the user when s/he goes online.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I hope that we don&#8217;t see something like that come about, but I would guess that it&#8217;s a possibility some time in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=2949#comment-208715</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=2949#comment-208715</guid>
		<description>This reminds me of a news story I saw a while back about how a Japanese mass transit company implemented software to monitor their clerk&#039;s facial expressions. Specifically, it was to give their employee&#039;s feedback on how to improve their smile&#039;s so that they appear more genuine (if I remember correctly). Would a human face be considered a machine readable representation? 

In the not so distant future; could people’s facial expressions automatically be aggregated in the context of this patent - such as when walking out of a comedy movie or upon receiving a meal at a restaurant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of a news story I saw a while back about how a Japanese mass transit company implemented software to monitor their clerk&#8217;s facial expressions. Specifically, it was to give their employee&#8217;s feedback on how to improve their smile&#8217;s so that they appear more genuine (if I remember correctly). Would a human face be considered a machine readable representation? </p>
<p>In the not so distant future; could people’s facial expressions automatically be aggregated in the context of this patent &#8211; such as when walking out of a comedy movie or upon receiving a meal at a restaurant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Slawski</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=2949#comment-207937</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=2949#comment-207937</guid>
		<description>Hi Joel,

I really do like the idea of including media in reviews, too.  Someone can tell you how great the seared scallops with oyster risotto was at the seafood restaurant they just visited, but showing you a photo or two of the dish might make you hop in your car and go get some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joel,</p>
<p>I really do like the idea of including media in reviews, too.  Someone can tell you how great the seared scallops with oyster risotto was at the seafood restaurant they just visited, but showing you a photo or two of the dish might make you hop in your car and go get some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel McLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=2949#comment-207758</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel McLaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 04:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=2949#comment-207758</guid>
		<description>I would have never thought of integrating media in to reviews, great idea on this patent Goog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have never thought of integrating media in to reviews, great idea on this patent Goog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
