<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google Image Treasure Hunt?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seobythesea.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3442</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing and Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Services, Consulting, and Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:24:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clinton Barett</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3442#comment-290863</link>
		<dc:creator>Clinton Barett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3442#comment-290863</guid>
		<description>@Jimmy - nice trick, too bad your blog is dead, I woud like to see this work.
I think eventually we will come to a point where computers will be able to figure out what is in the image :) not</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jimmy &#8211; nice trick, too bad your blog is dead, I woud like to see this work.<br />
I think eventually we will come to a point where computers will be able to figure out what is in the image <img src='http://www.seobythesea.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Slawski</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3442#comment-275678</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3442#comment-275678</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,

I&#039;ve been wondering why Google doesn&#039;t document these specialized type image searches.

I do think Google will start doing more with OCR at some point in the future.  It does seem to make sense for Google to try out games like this as well, since they try to solve problems that humans can solve much more easily than computers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been wondering why Google doesn&#8217;t document these specialized type image searches.</p>
<p>I do think Google will start doing more with OCR at some point in the future.  It does seem to make sense for Google to try out games like this as well, since they try to solve problems that humans can solve much more easily than computers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3442#comment-275666</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 22:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3442#comment-275666</guid>
		<description>I was just looking for information on this and came across this page - interesting overview. Google has become ever more advanced in this area over the last few years. It&#039;s interesting now that you can actually append the following to the end of an image search url: 

&amp;imgtype=face

and all that will be returned in your search are faces. You can perform similar queries with: 

&amp;imgtype=lineart and &amp;imgtype=body etc.

While this is nothing new it is still an interesting field when looking at the broader picture of just how Google plans to categorise the world&#039;s images. 

OCR is going to play a big part, and I think &quot;games&quot; such as this, where Google relies upon human judgement to categorise information or images, will become increasingly significant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just looking for information on this and came across this page &#8211; interesting overview. Google has become ever more advanced in this area over the last few years. It&#8217;s interesting now that you can actually append the following to the end of an image search url: </p>
<p>&amp;imgtype=face</p>
<p>and all that will be returned in your search are faces. You can perform similar queries with: </p>
<p>&amp;imgtype=lineart and &amp;imgtype=body etc.</p>
<p>While this is nothing new it is still an interesting field when looking at the broader picture of just how Google plans to categorise the world&#8217;s images. </p>
<p>OCR is going to play a big part, and I think &#8220;games&#8221; such as this, where Google relies upon human judgement to categorise information or images, will become increasingly significant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Slawski</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3442#comment-268669</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3442#comment-268669</guid>
		<description>Hi Guillermo,

There&#039;s always going to be some level or objectivity/subjectivity to any image.  A webmaster can take steps to help a search engine by using a file name, alt text, a caption, and even other text on a page that might be associated with an image.

If that webmaster wants people to look at the image, and be able to understand what the image is about without looking at that text, it doesn&#039;t hurt to choose the best picture possible, and limit some of that subjectivity.  So, if I was writing a page about the FBI, and I wanted to choose a picture that made it clear that people in the picture were FBI agents, I would try really hard to make sure I got a shot of at least one of those people wearing one of those blue jackets that FBI agents sometimes wear that have &quot;FBI&quot; on the back in big yellow letters - and that the &quot;FBI&quot; was clearly visible to viewers of the page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Guillermo,</p>
<p>There&#8217;s always going to be some level or objectivity/subjectivity to any image.  A webmaster can take steps to help a search engine by using a file name, alt text, a caption, and even other text on a page that might be associated with an image.</p>
<p>If that webmaster wants people to look at the image, and be able to understand what the image is about without looking at that text, it doesn&#8217;t hurt to choose the best picture possible, and limit some of that subjectivity.  So, if I was writing a page about the FBI, and I wanted to choose a picture that made it clear that people in the picture were FBI agents, I would try really hard to make sure I got a shot of at least one of those people wearing one of those blue jackets that FBI agents sometimes wear that have &#8220;FBI&#8221; on the back in big yellow letters &#8211; and that the &#8220;FBI&#8221; was clearly visible to viewers of the page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillermo Ortiz</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3442#comment-268051</link>
		<dc:creator>Guillermo Ortiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 05:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3442#comment-268051</guid>
		<description>I think John brought up an interesting point about how subjective some of image naming can potentially become. I wonder if Google will develop a way to develop relationships between two different descriptions of the same image. Can men in suits be FBI Agents?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think John brought up an interesting point about how subjective some of image naming can potentially become. I wonder if Google will develop a way to develop relationships between two different descriptions of the same image. Can men in suits be FBI Agents?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Slawski</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3442#comment-265428</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3442#comment-265428</guid>
		<description>Hi RD,

The ideas behind games like the ESP game and the treasure search are examples of crowdsourcing in action.  Google didn&#039;t acquire the ESP game, but rather licensed some of the technology behind it for the Image Labeler game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi RD,</p>
<p>The ideas behind games like the ESP game and the treasure search are examples of crowdsourcing in action.  Google didn&#8217;t acquire the ESP game, but rather licensed some of the technology behind it for the Image Labeler game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3442#comment-264923</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3442#comment-264923</guid>
		<description>I recently read somewhere about what is called &quot;Crowdsourcing&quot; and that&#039;s what Google Image thing appears to be... But I remember I read about this project in particular (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ESP_Game) and I now see it was acquired by GG so my guess is that Treasure Hunt is actually an extension of it or something...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently read somewhere about what is called &#8220;Crowdsourcing&#8221; and that&#8217;s what Google Image thing appears to be&#8230; But I remember I read about this project in particular (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ESP_Game">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ESP_Game</a>) and I now see it was acquired by GG so my guess is that Treasure Hunt is actually an extension of it or something&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Slawski</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3442#comment-263851</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3442#comment-263851</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,

I&#039;m not really sure much profiling is actually going on in what is described in this patent filing.  The idea instead is to create games that might help solve problems that computers might not be so good at solving on their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not really sure much profiling is actually going on in what is described in this patent filing.  The idea instead is to create games that might help solve problems that computers might not be so good at solving on their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
