<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How a Search Engine Might Weigh Pages with Relevant Annotations Higher in Search Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seobythesea.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3499</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing and Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Services, Consulting, and Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:24:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Slawski</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3499#comment-289342</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3499#comment-289342</guid>
		<description>Hi Richard,

It is a challenge that the search engines do face - trying to keep their interfaces as streamlined as possible to avoid clutter, confusion, and complexity.  But they also seem to want to expand in a way that they can offer assistance and help to searchers when it seems like that help might be need.  That can come in the form of query suggestions that they might include with search results.  

It&#039;s more likely that someone would use a query suggestion rather than an advanced search operator like a &quot;label:&quot; in front of an additional word in a query.  As an observer, it&#039;s interesting to watch and see what Google might do to make it easier for searchers to find what they are looking for while simultaneously avoiding &quot;messy&quot; search interfaces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard,</p>
<p>It is a challenge that the search engines do face &#8211; trying to keep their interfaces as streamlined as possible to avoid clutter, confusion, and complexity.  But they also seem to want to expand in a way that they can offer assistance and help to searchers when it seems like that help might be need.  That can come in the form of query suggestions that they might include with search results.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s more likely that someone would use a query suggestion rather than an advanced search operator like a &#8220;label:&#8221; in front of an additional word in a query.  As an observer, it&#8217;s interesting to watch and see what Google might do to make it easier for searchers to find what they are looking for while simultaneously avoiding &#8220;messy&#8221; search interfaces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3499#comment-288866</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 01:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3499#comment-288866</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a good idea, but as stated by others I think not many &#039;casual&#039; searches would use this feature only SEO people and marketers. The problem with the search engines (especially Google) adding these labels at the top of the search results is that the results may begin to look &#039;messy&#039; with the additional options. Google is as big as it is to a large part due to the fact thet the UID (user interface design) is so simple and easy to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good idea, but as stated by others I think not many &#8216;casual&#8217; searches would use this feature only SEO people and marketers. The problem with the search engines (especially Google) adding these labels at the top of the search results is that the results may begin to look &#8216;messy&#8217; with the additional options. Google is as big as it is to a large part due to the fact thet the UID (user interface design) is so simple and easy to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Slawski</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3499#comment-286862</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3499#comment-286862</guid>
		<description>Hi Paolo,

I think so as well - instead of additional searches, we might start seeing some options to refine results in intelligent ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paolo,</p>
<p>I think so as well &#8211; instead of additional searches, we might start seeing some options to refine results in intelligent ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paolo</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3499#comment-285667</link>
		<dc:creator>Paolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 15:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3499#comment-285667</guid>
		<description>Consumer search operators! Yes probably the way forward Bill. Multiple options other than &#039;search&#039; would be welcome I&#039;d expect and define is an interesting one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumer search operators! Yes probably the way forward Bill. Multiple options other than &#8216;search&#8217; would be welcome I&#8217;d expect and define is an interesting one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Slawski</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3499#comment-279187</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 19:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3499#comment-279187</guid>
		<description>Hi Paolo,

Those are good points.  Instead of people using a &quot;label&quot; type search operator, the search engine might instead offer those labels at the tops of search results based upon annotations made by others, categories determined by the search engine, and in other ways a well.

For example, you can use a &quot;define&quot; search operator to get a definition of something, such as &quot;define:entropy&quot;, but if your query is &quot;what is entropy&quot; (without the quotation marks), Google shows you a definition at the top of the search results.  Likewise, the people at Google may try to find a way to offer labels to searchers without requiring them to use the &quot;label&quot; search operator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paolo,</p>
<p>Those are good points.  Instead of people using a &#8220;label&#8221; type search operator, the search engine might instead offer those labels at the tops of search results based upon annotations made by others, categories determined by the search engine, and in other ways a well.</p>
<p>For example, you can use a &#8220;define&#8221; search operator to get a definition of something, such as &#8220;define:entropy&#8221;, but if your query is &#8220;what is entropy&#8221; (without the quotation marks), Google shows you a definition at the top of the search results.  Likewise, the people at Google may try to find a way to offer labels to searchers without requiring them to use the &#8220;label&#8221; search operator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paolo</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3499#comment-277952</link>
		<dc:creator>Paolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 19:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3499#comment-277952</guid>
		<description>I think the question of how many people would actually use this type of search operator is important. How many people who haven&#039;t work in SEO or a web related field are aware that google can be used in this way? A very small percentage I would suggest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the question of how many people would actually use this type of search operator is important. How many people who haven&#8217;t work in SEO or a web related field are aware that google can be used in this way? A very small percentage I would suggest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Search &#38; Social News: 03/09/2010 &#124; Search Engine Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3499#comment-249784</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Search &#38; Social News: 03/09/2010 &#124; Search Engine Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3499#comment-249784</guid>
		<description>[...] How a Search Engine Might Weigh Pages with Relevant Annotations Higher in Search Results – SEO by the Sea. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How a Search Engine Might Weigh Pages with Relevant Annotations Higher in Search Results – SEO by the Sea. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Slawski</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3499#comment-247979</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3499#comment-247979</guid>
		<description>Hi Adam,

Thank you.  I suspect that the percentage of people who use advanced search operators as search tools (rather than to do something like check information about their own sites, or competitors sites, or to do keyword research), is rather small too.

I&#039;m not sure if many searchers (who know about them) are really all that excited about doing an allinanchor or allintitle or allinurl type search to help them find information, or will start doing so in the future.  If Google introduces the &quot;label&quot; search operator, will more and more people start using it?  I don&#039;t know if they will.  I would think that Google would have to take some steps to help educate their users on how it could be helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Adam,</p>
<p>Thank you.  I suspect that the percentage of people who use advanced search operators as search tools (rather than to do something like check information about their own sites, or competitors sites, or to do keyword research), is rather small too.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if many searchers (who know about them) are really all that excited about doing an allinanchor or allintitle or allinurl type search to help them find information, or will start doing so in the future.  If Google introduces the &#8220;label&#8221; search operator, will more and more people start using it?  I don&#8217;t know if they will.  I would think that Google would have to take some steps to help educate their users on how it could be helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
