<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Boosts the Importance of Local Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seobythesea.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=458</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing and Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Services, Consulting, and Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:42:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mihmorandum &#124; Has Local Search 2.0 Arrived? &#124; Google</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=458#comment-112947</link>
		<dc:creator>Mihmorandum &#124; Has Local Search 2.0 Arrived? &#124; Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=458#comment-112947</guid>
		<description>[...] Search 1.0 seems to me to map fairly well (no pun intended) to Local 1.0. In my opinion, the official &#8220;birth&#8221; of Local Search was January 30, 2007, when Bill Slawski published this article about Google beginning to integrate Local Results into Web SERPs, coinciding neatly with Danny&#8217;s &#8220;birthdate&#8221; of Search 3.0. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Search 1.0 seems to me to map fairly well (no pun intended) to Local 1.0. In my opinion, the official &#8220;birth&#8221; of Local Search was January 30, 2007, when Bill Slawski published this article about Google beginning to integrate Local Results into Web SERPs, coinciding neatly with Danny&#8217;s &#8220;birthdate&#8221; of Search 3.0. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Slawski</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=458#comment-34323</link>
		<dc:creator>William Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 02:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=458#comment-34323</guid>
		<description>I was excited to see Marissa Mayer&#039;s statement on the OneBox, because it was pretty consistent with my reading of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchengineland.com/googles-onebox-patent-application-10325&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OneBox Patent&lt;/a&gt; filing from around a week ago.  User click throughs and other activities determine which database shows up as a onebox, if any at all.

Though I think that there are times when that might be trumped, like in Miriam&#039;s example of the Pizza family. :)

I suspect that Google might be prioritizing people&#039;s phone numbers over onebox results, purposefully.

You&#039;re welcome, Miriam.  Anita&#039;s been coming out with some great stuff for a few years, but this was the first time we had ever really had worked together in some way, which was nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was excited to see Marissa Mayer&#8217;s statement on the OneBox, because it was pretty consistent with my reading of the <a href="http://searchengineland.com/googles-onebox-patent-application-10325">OneBox Patent</a> filing from around a week ago.  User click throughs and other activities determine which database shows up as a onebox, if any at all.</p>
<p>Though I think that there are times when that might be trumped, like in Miriam&#8217;s example of the Pizza family. <img src='http://www.seobythesea.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I suspect that Google might be prioritizing people&#8217;s phone numbers over onebox results, purposefully.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re welcome, Miriam.  Anita&#8217;s been coming out with some great stuff for a few years, but this was the first time we had ever really had worked together in some way, which was nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miriam Ellis-Loraditch</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=458#comment-34320</link>
		<dc:creator>Miriam Ellis-Loraditch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=458#comment-34320</guid>
		<description>Hello Bill -
Thank you for the link to the Anita Campbell article. Her name is new to me, but her article was really an excellent primer and her site looks very useful. Congratulations on being her inside source for that article.

I thought I&#039;d mention, I tried your &#039;pizza search&#039; for the largest town in my county, and rather than getting the type of results for this that you did for Newark, I got three phone numbers for people whose last name was Pizza! How whacky! John and Lynne Pizza may be getting some unwanted phone calls...

Why would Google not have pizza shops in my area for this new local search function? Haven&#039;t gotten around to finding them yet? What do you think? I&#039;d be interested to know.

Mirian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Bill -<br />
Thank you for the link to the Anita Campbell article. Her name is new to me, but her article was really an excellent primer and her site looks very useful. Congratulations on being her inside source for that article.</p>
<p>I thought I&#8217;d mention, I tried your &#8216;pizza search&#8217; for the largest town in my county, and rather than getting the type of results for this that you did for Newark, I got three phone numbers for people whose last name was Pizza! How whacky! John and Lynne Pizza may be getting some unwanted phone calls&#8230;</p>
<p>Why would Google not have pizza shops in my area for this new local search function? Haven&#8217;t gotten around to finding them yet? What do you think? I&#8217;d be interested to know.</p>
<p>Mirian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=458#comment-34316</link>
		<dc:creator>Earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=458#comment-34316</guid>
		<description>One other side comment.  I thought the Gord Hotchkiss interview w/Melissa Mayer of Google at Searchengineland on 1/26 was very revealing with regard to user activity vis a vis application of the onebox.

She noted its usage, fluctuation of usage, and that Google keeps it when there is significant visitor clickthroughs on the onebox and eliminates when it doesn&#039;t draw visitor action.

Clearly Google monitors, evaluates and has a better read on visitor usage of all aspects of its pages than any of us and it clearly has a tight read on onebox effectiveness.

Over the long term I&#039;d bet they&#039;ll monetise this.
 
In the meantime It&#039;s a potential seachange for local entities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other side comment.  I thought the Gord Hotchkiss interview w/Melissa Mayer of Google at Searchengineland on 1/26 was very revealing with regard to user activity vis a vis application of the onebox.</p>
<p>She noted its usage, fluctuation of usage, and that Google keeps it when there is significant visitor clickthroughs on the onebox and eliminates when it doesn&#8217;t draw visitor action.</p>
<p>Clearly Google monitors, evaluates and has a better read on visitor usage of all aspects of its pages than any of us and it clearly has a tight read on onebox effectiveness.</p>
<p>Over the long term I&#8217;d bet they&#8217;ll monetise this.</p>
<p>In the meantime It&#8217;s a potential seachange for local entities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Slawski</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=458#comment-34294</link>
		<dc:creator>William Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=458#comment-34294</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve checked with a couple of people who are showing in those enhanced onebox local results, and we&#039;re seeing traffic up because of them.

Since they are in the new format, people may be clicking on them based upon their novelty.  But since there&#039;s not a lot of distinction between them and organic results (same width and not much of a gap between them and the organic results), I think they may continue to draw traffic.

They may have an impact upon your longtail terms.  I agree with you on the importance of folks taking a close look at their traffic stats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve checked with a couple of people who are showing in those enhanced onebox local results, and we&#8217;re seeing traffic up because of them.</p>
<p>Since they are in the new format, people may be clicking on them based upon their novelty.  But since there&#8217;s not a lot of distinction between them and organic results (same width and not much of a gap between them and the organic results), I think they may continue to draw traffic.</p>
<p>They may have an impact upon your longtail terms.  I agree with you on the importance of folks taking a close look at their traffic stats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=458#comment-34290</link>
		<dc:creator>Earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=458#comment-34290</guid>
		<description>Bill:

I rigorously check my biz long tail searches with local phrases and I can see where this is going to be detrimental to me immediately.  A short while ago my biz google local listings went south.  I haven&#039;t had time to check it and wasn&#039;t too concerned...but now it will have dramatic impact.  My guess is it will negatively impact 1/3 of my best leads based on this latest series of changes.

If people focused on local business sites are following this I&#039;d look at this real hard.  

This site and mike blumenthal&#039;s blog at blumenthals.com/blog are great resources for looking at what is going on with regard to G maps.

I&#039;d check it immediately.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill:</p>
<p>I rigorously check my biz long tail searches with local phrases and I can see where this is going to be detrimental to me immediately.  A short while ago my biz google local listings went south.  I haven&#8217;t had time to check it and wasn&#8217;t too concerned&#8230;but now it will have dramatic impact.  My guess is it will negatively impact 1/3 of my best leads based on this latest series of changes.</p>
<p>If people focused on local business sites are following this I&#8217;d look at this real hard.  </p>
<p>This site and mike blumenthal&#8217;s blog at blumenthals.com/blog are great resources for looking at what is going on with regard to G maps.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d check it immediately.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Slawski</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=458#comment-34287</link>
		<dc:creator>William Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=458#comment-34287</guid>
		<description>I think that it will, too, Dave.

I&#039;ve seen some grumbling about it in some places on the web, but I think that it is a good move forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it will, too, Dave.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen some grumbling about it in some places on the web, but I think that it is a good move forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=458#comment-34286</link>
		<dc:creator>Earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=458#comment-34286</guid>
		<description>I can see the differences and impacts already.  This will have dramatic effects for local business/services on the web.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the differences and impacts already.  This will have dramatic effects for local business/services on the web.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
