We can help make your web site easier to find, and easier to use.

Recommended Reading










Search on the Seas: Google Water-Based Data Center Patent Granted

Imagine a fleet of sea-worthy vessels being able to deliver computing needs to people without having to send information cross country, but rather anchored on the seas nearby.

Now consider data centers on those ships being powered by the waves and cooled by the waters.

Google was granted a patent on a water-based data center today:

Water-based data center
Invented by Jimmy Clidaras, David W. Stiver, and William Hamburgen
Assigned to Google
Granted: April 28, 2009
Filed February 26, 2007

Abstract

A system includes a floating platform-mounted computer data center comprising a plurality of computing units, a sea-based electrical generator in electrical connection with the plurality of computing units, and one or more sea-water cooling units for providing cooling to the plurality of computing units.

Some of the topics covered in the patent:

1) Wave powered generators such as Pelamis machines may power sea-based data centers and pumps to cool them.

2) Land-based data centers could also be used, taking energy from platforms floating on water.

3) The data centers might be contained in standard shipping containers, loaded aboard ships and connected to cooling and electrical systems aboard those ships. The ships may then be deployed to where they are needed. Google has previously been granted a patent for a Modular Data Center

4) The patent notes in closing that electricity could also be generated from other sources to power data centers, such as sea-based wind generator farms and power from river currents.

5) A patent application from 2008, under the Exaflop LLC name, describes a way of cooling data centers using warm water cooling. Exaflop is headquartered at the same address as Google, and has filed a number of patent applications involving data centers. This patent filing anticipates the possibility of data centers in modular containers aboard ships:

[0102] Alternatively, cooling water may be obtained out of the body of water in which the boats sit, such as when free cooling using deep lake cooling. In addition, generators on the boat or other sorts of power plants on the boats, may generate electricity for the data centers. In such situations, a boat may be anchored offshore, and may attach to an offshore data connection, such as an optical fiber connection.

In this manner, computing power may be easily projected geographically on short notice, and may be alternatively used at sea and on land as the need arises. For example, where a large event is expected to occur, or a large number of computer users is expected to congregate, near a port, such a data center may be supplied at the port.

Will Google start creating data centers that operate on seas and lakes, generating their own electricity and cooling their operations with the waves they float upon? It’s looking like a possibility.

  • Share/Bookmark

51 comments to Search on the Seas: Google Water-Based Data Center Patent Granted

  • How do they plan to connect these data centers? They need 100s of Wi-Max antenna to handle the kind of bandwidth they require. Satellite communication would be too slow.

  • I’d like to see how those brainstorming sessions in google go. I mean their ideas get crazier and crazier each time I read about them. But I guess getting energy from waves might be a very nice way of saving money.

  • Hillarious, yet what a great idea.

    I recently read an article in a british national newspaper that claimed a single google search used as much electricity as boiling a kettle. In theroy I can understand this, with a mmount of hdd activity, but in the scheme things it uses less engery than sending a hard copy of information to person to person.

    Nice find, great read!

    Phillip

  • Sounds interesting as long as they aren’t located in Hurricane or Typhoon alley.

  • Aren’t containers already used somewhere as a modular means of managing data-centres? Can’t find the article now but I’m sure I have read about it before. Guess it isn’t a huge leap to thinking… hey, you know what carries containers!? Although I do agree with Jeet, I think they would have to be fairly constrained in location/size due to bandwidth and possibly the power requirements.

    As for the newspaper article Phillip, it took a small quote taken completely out of context to get to the attention-grabbing headline that they came to!

  • One more thing – I wouldn’t park these boats off the Somali coast either or Google may have to deal with some serious piracy.

  • [...] in September, Google made waves by submitting a patent for wave-powered datacenter. Yesterday, SEO By the Sea reported that Google was granted its patent. Congratulations [...]

  • [...] Search on the Seas: Google Water-Based Data Center Patent Granted, SEO By The Sea [...]

  • [...] patent award was spotted first by SEO by the Sea. As noted previously, the floating data center idea is quite novel and makes a ton of sense. For [...]

  • I remember hearing about this a while ago and dismissing it as a far fetched idea. Now it looks like they’ll go ahead with it. I wouldn’t write it off because of bandwidth issues, I’m sure they’ll get around it somehow. The self generated power is certainly something that other companies should look into.

  • Glyn

    Completely riddiculous that a patent can be granted for such a thing.

  • Intersting idea, whould like to see how they are going to implement this))))) though alternative power sources should be used more effectively

  • Hi Jeet,

    Good question. The focus of the patent is on generating electricity and providing cooling for the data centers, but it doesn’t cover how high bandwidth data connections would become available to these water-based data centers. I’d like to hear more on how that might be accomplished.

    Hi Bezpieczenstwo,

    Given the cost of land to develop upon, the ability for a data center to relocate quickly, savings from energy generation and cooling, and other possible benefits from this approach, it is an interesting idea.

    Hi Phillip,

    I remember reading that as well. I believe that the original article was Revealed: the environmental impact of Google searches, and that it focused upon the amount of CO2 generated per search, as opposed to the amount of energy used.

    “performing two Google searches from a desktop computer can generate about the same amount of carbon dioxide as boiling a kettle”

    The BBC also picked up on it, but added some additional details that disputed the actual cost of a Google Search:

    ‘Carbon cost’ of Google revealed

    The official Google Blog covered that claim as well, and there are a couple of interesting updates in their post:

    Powering a Google search

    In the last update, Google tells us that “a typical individual’s Google use for an entire year would produce about the same amount of CO2 as just a single load of washing.”

  • Hi People Finder,

    Interestingly, one of the “purposes” that Google states is behind using data centers aboard ships might be to provide computing power to areas that have been subjected to natural disasters. Another might be where a “military presence” is needed:

    Also, transient needs for computing power may arise in a particular area. For example, a military presence may be needed in an area, a natural disaster may bring a need for computing or telecommunication presence in an area until the natural infrastructure can be repaired or rebuilt, and certain events may draw thousands of people who may put a load on the local computing infrastructure.

    That might mean being located in an area that is at risk, whether natural or manmade.

  • Hi Chris,

    Sun released a commercial version of a data center in a shipping container. Information about it here:

    The Internet in a Box

    Google’s patent on a Modular Data Center was filed in 2003, and granted in 2007.

    Data Center Knowledge has a recent story that you might find interesting:

    Google Unveils Its Container Data Center

  • Hi Adam,

    It doesn’t seem as farfetched now, does it. I suspect the bandwidth issues won’t be a stumbling block either.

    Hi Glyn,

    The idea itself is interesting. Should floating data centers be something that should be patentable? That’s a good question. I’d like to see a serious argument on both sides from people who practice patent law.

    Hi website optimisation,

    I think that’s what I like best about this approach – that it takes alternative power generation very seriously.

  • Hmmm… If they can overcome the heavy metals problem, maybe at the end of their useful life they can sink them as eco-friendly artificial reefs.

  • Hi Tom,

    Heavy metal contaminants aren’t unique to the anti-foulant paints used on ships, but I’m not sure if I would be surprised to see a Google patent filing addressing that problem either these days. :)

  • [...] Search on the Seas: Google Water-Based Data Center Patent Granted [...]

  • [...] patent award was spotted first by SEO by the Sea. As noted previously, the floating data center idea is quite novel and makes a ton of sense. For [...]

  • [...] the post Search on the Seas: Google Water-Based Data Center Patent Granted, Bill lists some of the topics covered in the patent as [...]

  • [...] week’s Caithness Courier to be investigating the Pentland Firth as a potential site for its newly-patened water-based data [...]

  • [...] Google was eyeing the strong currents in the Firth for as a potential source of energy for its newly-patened water-based data centres. As the Scotsman article stated, the Crown Office cautioned that the 40 or [...]

  • I worked on a container ship for 15 years. I believe that it would work. The weather is the wild card.

  • Hi Chuck,

    Thanks for your unique perspective on whether or not Google’s water-based approach might work.

    I imagine that there are some stumbling blocks that it’s hard to see on paper that might provide challenges – weather does sound like it might something to be concerned about in a significant way. You’ve probably seen some serious storms during your 15 years on the waters.

  • Google has really a thing for the ocean and water.

  • Hi Albert,

    They do seem to. That’s not a bad thing (I’m saying that as the “SEO by the Sea.”)

  • Khazret Sapenov

    Hi Bill, seems as things really move on with sea-based data centers.
    Good to see that power supply part of equation (or rather system of equations) is being solved bit by bit.
    Placing such data centers in proximity to trans-ocean cable landings on ocean floor could solve connectivity problem (there are also a couple of other solutions). I can’t post pictures here, so see illustrations at http://ihatecubicle.blogspot.com/2008/09/ocean-floor-data-center.html.

    I would also take a closer look at optimizing heat exchange part and corruption.

  • Hi Khazret,

    Thank you for the information about the possible placement of water-based data centers near trans-ocean cable landings, It is going to be interesting to see how Google goes forward in implementing these data centers.

  • You have to give it to Google, they don’t stand still for long! My initials thoughts are that water and electricity aren’t a great mix, but if the data centres were stored on huge frigates, I presume there as safe as on land

  • Hi Hertfordshire SEO,

    Frigates like that would certainly have their own safety concerns, but I’m beginning to like the idea more and more. I keep on wondering if search engines have their own navies within the next ten years.

  • These day generating electricity from the waves in the sea is fast becoming a reality with several large prototypes already in existence. But I don’t understand having a data centre in the sea like someone said before how would you get the connections up and running. I am no expert but this sounds like a crazy idea.

  • Hi Greenman,

    I haven’t seen much in the patents from Google on the connections, but we have seen Google in discussions about putting a floating data center in Scotland, mentioned in the comments above. That seems to indicate that they have some idea of how to move forward with that issue.

  • This sounds like an interesting concept, although the setting up and maintaining of this kind of system may kick up plenty of problems for Google. Still, it’ll be interesting to see how they get round them all and make this work.

  • Hi Terry,

    It is pretty interesting. The idea of Google having their own navy, and advertising for datacenter managers with nautical experience is something I’m looking forward to seeing.

  • Google is a monster. They evolved massively :)

  • Hi Berita,

    They’ve been pretty persistent, with their share of successes and failures, but they keep on moving along.

  • Wow, that’s like pure science fiction. I have to admit that I don’t quite believe it – the bandwith issues flagged above must surely be a show stopper – mustn’t it?

  • Hi Steve,

    I don’t think that bandwidth would be a problem, especially since they seem to be negotiating in Scotland on locating such a floating data center off the coast there.

  • Isn’t this proof that Google has the most innovative and intelligent team between Fortune 500? By the way, does anyone have any information about the usage of the concept of the patent?

  • Hi Orik,

    Google does strive to innovate, but I’m not sure that we really know too much about what is going on behind some of the doors of the corporate headquarters of some of the other Fortune 500. As I noted in the comments above, we do have some news about negotiations between Google and government agencies in Scotland about the possibility of floating an off-shore data center off its coastline. We can’t tell for certain, but that might be a proof of concept of the idea under development.

  • I’d say it seems like a very good idea. As most of Google’s ideas usually are. I guess they weren’t happy with just taking over the internet now they want the oceans too! LOL

  • Hi Trent,

    It does seem like a good idea, but it also presents a lot of new challenges. I’m keeping my eyes open for Google job postings requiring ship board experience. :)

  • Yep, Google have their grip on the ether – now its the physical world, then the whole galaxy!! In all seriousness, they are certainly not resting on their laurels. They know that the minute they think they have everyone beat, they’ll be falling by the way side. Ambitious and innovative – let’s juts hope they continue to play fair.

  • Hi Jon,

    It is unusual to see something like this patent from a company that we believe is focused primarily on search, and it is innovative. It will be interesting to see if they do move forward, and set up a data center like this.

  • How will they be connected? It must be rather hard to connect them properly if they are located under the sea.

  • Hi Nathan,

    How these floating data centers might be connected to the Web isn’t one of the details covered in the patent filing itself. I’m not sure that it’s an impediment to how one of these systems might work, though.

  • What a great idea. It would save money and be more environmentally friendly. The only issue I can see is the high maintenance when something goes wrong. As we are seeing now with the BP oil rig, large structures out at sea can be very prone to destruction!

    Also, can you really picture Google’s engineers with their skateboards and baggy pants working in an oil-rig style environment? ;)

  • Thanks, codersteve. I agree with you.

  • Hi Sarah,

    It looks like these floating datacenters may actually be set near a coastline rather than miles off land.

    I can imagine someone on a Google Segway or skateboard on one of these, but I was thinking they would probably look more like cargo ships than oil rigs. Google has a patent filed for datacenters in cargo containers, so a cargo ship might be a better fit.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>