In early April, Googleguy posted at the Search Engine Watch Forums, and his post was split off into a thread titled Google Confirms Mid-Page “See Results For” Section No Longer A Test; Suggest A Name!.
In his post, he tells us that:
In fact, this is no longer a test. We do this when we see a query (e.g. [katrina] or something similar) that we think might benefit from a refinement, (e.g. maybe you wanted to search for [hurricane katrina]).
If you haven’t seen the additional query results in question, they are links for some alternative suggested search terms, appearing in the middle of the top ten results that Google returns.
Those alternative suggestions had been referred to as user interface (UI) experiments, along with a number of other different ways of presenting Google results.
I remember back in 1997 when a friend of mine sent me a link to a site started by Danny Sullivan, named Search Engine Watch.
We were just getting our hands and minds wrapped around promoting a site on the web, and learning as much as we could about how the web worked, and about how to run a business online. It was exciting to see Danny’s post at the Search Engine Watch Blog yesterday on My Decade Of Writing About Search Engines, and it brought back some memories of resources like his “A Webmaster’s Guide To Search Engines” that helped tremendously.
We had launched a site in 1996, and tried to learn and implement something new almost everyday. It’s ten years later, and I’m still excited about learning new things about the web, and marketing, and online promotion.
I’ve also tried to share some of what I’ve been learning as an administrator at Cre8asite Forums, and I discovered early on there that the conversations that evolve out of sharing ideas and information with others can be richly rewarding, and lead to friendships, career changes, and a deep satisfaction in finding something that you love to do.
Google was granted a new patent involving pagerank last week, which appears to focus upon a paper from April of 2003, Adaptive Methods for the Computation of PageRank.
The paper does a nice job of describing what they were aiming at with this patent – a faster way of assigning query-independent rankings of value to pages on the web, based upon links to those pages. This work doesn’t aim at changing rankings, or determinations of relevance of web pages, but is instead aimed at making the computational elements of calculating rankings cheaper and faster.
While the methods and processes described in the patent aren’t really anything new, it’s interesting to see how the ideas in the paper can be implemented as part of a search engine. The patent provides a nice overview of how a search engine functions, covering topics such as crawling, filtering, indexing, index partitioning, caching, mapping links, and serving pages.
It then dives into the method they have devised to take advantage of the observation they made that some pages take less time, and less recalculations of pagerank to reach their final pagerank. As the authors note in the paper:
I was exploring the FirstGov web site from the US government, and their section on web content, and I wondered how much of our tax dollars are being spent on paid search. I remember seeing some paid ads by the DEA last summer, and the agency is still using Google Adwords.
On the webcontent.gov page about search engines, the webmasters provide information to help people working on US government sites add site searches, and they also give a window into future additions on the webcontent.gov site, including “Getting found on search engines (search engine optimization).”
I looked around to see if they had anything about paid advertising, and found some guidelines about advertising on government sites, but nothing about using paid search on search engines.
I’m tempted to volunteer some information and assistance on SEO, especially if it could help them to build a more balanced online advertising presence within Google and other search engines (and maybe reduce my tax bill).
(Added – June 20, 2008 – this post was orginally written on April 15, 2006, and describes the technical background of Dr. Lu as he became a Senior Vice President of Yahoo back then. Now, it might serve as an indication of some of the talent that Yahoo is losing after a number of executives, including Dr. Lu are leaving Yahoo )
A press release from Yahoo! earlier today noted that Dr. Qi Lu has been appointed as their new Senior Vice President of Engineering for Search and Search Marketing.
Dr. Lu has been active in a wide range of activities while at Yahoo!, including their search platform, and their social search activities. The press release notes that he has been involved in;
I have a few friends who probably spend a little more time playing computer games every week than they should. I try to stay away, because I know how addictive those games can be (I’ll confess though, that I’ve been wanting to play spore for a while.
Wouldn’t it be nice to have a web site that’s as addictive as one of those games?
Luke W, at Functioning Form, collected an excellent set of links to papers on Games & User Experience. There are some fun reads amongst those, and you might experience a “eureka” moment or two as you go through them.
A website isn’t a game, but there are aspects of games that can be incorporated into sites to make them more engaging, and interesting. That can lead to people bookmarketing pages, linking to them, and referring them to friends.
There’s been a lot of speculation that Google would launch some type of micropayment system soon, and a patent application issued today seems to bring that closer to us.
This isn’t the first patent application from Google that talks about micro-payments. One from a couple of years ago, Method for searching media , discusses the delivery of premium content from magazines and newspapers and books in exchange for very small payments.
And, with talk of Google Base, Google Wallet, and the ability to sell videos on Google Video search, it has seemed inevitable that some type of payment system would be in place soon.
Google Base already has methods in place for people to accept payments through Google, though those seem to be on a per-transaction basis. TechCrunch showed off some screenshots of a seller reputation page in the beginning of March. The new patent application includes the consolidation of payments to sellers, which would make micropayments more viable, and also a reputation management system.
A new patent from Yahoo! was granted this morning. Note that the classifications being talked about aren’t based upon relevance, but rather upon categories that documents being retrieved by the search engine might belong to, such as ones based upon language or region.
Associating documents with classifications and ranking documents based on classification weights
Inventors: Hongyuan Zha and Sean Suchter
Assigned to Yahoo! Inc.
US Patent 7,028,027
Granted April 11, 2006
Filed: September 30, 2002
A method and apparatus for associating documents with classification values and ranking documents based on classification weights is provided.