At Google’s 15th anniversary celebration last summer, shortly after Hummingbird was introduced, Tamar Yehoshua, Google VP of Search, showed us conversational search at Google by first demonstrating a query asking for “pictures of the Eiffel Tower”, and then following up with the query “How tall is It?”
In that second query, Google had to not only remember the Eiffel Tower was being asked about, but also to recognize the Eiffel Tower when it was being referred to as “it.” That is part of the new “conversational search” that Google is now engaging in, using something know by linguists as a “coreference.” I wanted to write about coreferences to clear up confusion that people might have had about them.
Hat tip to Barbara Starr (follow her on Google+ for interesting news on Semantic Search and new technology developments), who asked the question that is the title to this post (using slighly different words.)
You really need to visit the Magic Leap website to get a sense of what they are capable of doing, and there are a few more details about this funding on their press page, including this line from Google’s Sundar Pichai, SVP at Google:
I’ve been exploring some of the different search results that we see at Google, including things such as rich snippets and question-answering results, and came across a couple of patent filings from Google that describe something called “Enriched Results.”
You’ve seen enriched results before. As the first of the patent filings tells us, these results tend to be for things such as:
I recently asked my web host to move my site to another server.
During the migration, which seems to have taken content from the site from a week ago, and moved it to the new server today, without my last four posts or the comments that were left on them.
I was able to rescue my last four blog posts by taking them from Google’s cache, but not the comments that were left on them. They were there the first time I looked, but I wasn’t sure how to migrate those over. I returned to them after an hour or so with the thought of copying them and reposting and then editing the times on them, but… they were gone.
I apologize for that – I appreciate very much when people to leave their thoughts, and I regret that I was unable to rescue those before Google started showing the new versions of the posts I had set up, within its cache but without the comments.
Telepresence is not science fiction. We could have a remote‑controlled economy by the twenty‑first century if we start planning right now The technical scope of such a project would be no greater than that of designing a new military aircraft.
A genuine telepresence system requires new ways to sense the various motions of a person’s hands. This means new motors, sensors, and lightweight actuators. Prototypes will be complex, but as designs mature, much of that complexity will move from hardware to easily copied computer software. The first ten years of telepresence research will see the development of basic instruments: geometry, mechanics, sensors, effectors, and control theory and its human interface.
During the second decade we will work ‘to make the instruments rugged, reliable, and natural.
In my first Patent Free Friday, I was going to write about two of the best marketers in the town I live in, a pair of bakers who bake on either end of the historic Main Street in Warrenton Virginia. I guess getting up in the early morning to bake the bread is conducive to letting marketing ideas nurture and thrive. They are both worth writing about, so I’m going to reserve that topic for another day, and not give away too much here, yet.
Another topic arose last week as I presented at Pubcon, and ran into an old friend, who used to be a moderator in a web forum that I was an administrator of. He asked me a question that I’ve been thinking about since, coming up with a lot of different answers. I’m going to share that question now, but not my answers until another Friday, to give you a chance to think about how you might answer the question.
Google recently started showing “How to” lists in search results, which tend to show the first few steps of some task, and then let you click through to a page to see more. Like the recipes above for things like guacamole:
They have also published an interesting paper that describes some of the steps that need to take place for one of these snippets to be created, which is titled Cooking with Semantics (pdf).
At the time, Google had a Subscribed links program, where site owners could create specialized search results based upon certain patterns of queries, that would show additional content for a searcher. For some of those, you had to log into your Google Account and subscribe to certain links to be shown special content.
Oddly, some of those specialized search results didn’t require subscriptions, and didn’t require logging in. Much like these NFL sports Scores from this weekend: