I am starting an “SEO Classics” category on SEO by the Sea for papers by Search Engineers or focusing on Information Retrieval or SEO practices. I have a category tag for some older posts. I will write newer posts for this category since I have come across documents that should become considered SEO Classics or cover Classic SEO topics.
One of my all-time favorite posts about Improving Linking Confidence between pages on the Web is a User Experience (UX) Classic from UIE.com called Getting Confidence From Lincoln.
This article tells us that visitors look for confidence about the anchor text in a link and how close that anchor text matches the content found on the other side of the association. Google does refer to confidence about facts and information on the Web, but it gets used a little differently here.
Confidence here means the likelihood that visitors will continue to follow links on a site as long as they have confidence in the topic found on the other side of that link. The word “confidence” appears in newer semantic content on the Web. It is something I focused on a lot in the post: Looking at Related Documents Titles and Anchor Text when Collecting Facts about an Entity. That post isn’t about Improving Linking Confidence directly. That post is about the confidence that those facts applied to a specific entity.
Building this kind of confidence into links or facts and entities and the connections between pages of a site can be an essential part of the structure of a page. They can determine how deeply a visitor might travel, which is crucial for improving linking confidence.
There is a list of SEO Classics and I will hopefully publish more of them soon.
Thank you for sharing. This is an excellent lesson for anyone, especially when building an internal linking strategy, sometimes the temptation to say each page needs 5-10 internal links instead of making sure the links offer the specific results the user is looking for.
Losing your user’s confidence will do far more harm in the long term than not including the required quota you have decided for internal linking.
Nice introduction. Came here via a link by Search Herald π
I’d like to hear more about this with as many real life references as possible.
Showing the difference with internal and external links, if any, would be good as well as what and not to do – i.e. getting back to basics. Hopefully gives you some ideas.
Thanks, Iβll have to dig in to this Tag. I met Jared Spool about 10 years ago at one of his his conferences in Boston. Super smart & very giving (like you) and love everything he writes. One of my favorite papers is Designing for the scent of information. It changed my whole thinking of site optimization. Itβs also a classic.
This is my first time i visit here. I found so many interesting stuff in your blog especially its discussion. Really its great article.Very useful post.
HI Bill,
I had the good fortune of seeing Jared Spool in Philadephia – definitely a good experience. There is a lot to learn from him.
Great post! Do you have any examples on real websites? As a beginner, it’d be awesome to see the difference of what to do vs. what not to do. Thanks again.
Hi Michael,
I incorporated this approach into customer sites that I was doing site audits on – with a section that looked at top level navigation on those sites, and then how well the anchor text for internal links described the text on the pages link to. It didn’t often result in many changes, but being able to check whether or not it should lead to changes mad the sites I was auditioning more effective. You can try that with your own site – see how well your internal links match up with the content that they link to on your pages. It’s a nice little audit project.
Hi Jon,
Building confidence in the visitors you your site keeps them around longer, and can lead to people buying goods and services, which is ideal.
Hi Anthony,
I am trying to build up some more actionable posts in this SEO Classics category It feels good to do so far. I do have some ideas for other posts too.
I have been following your website for a while. Found interesting your old posts. This one is useful for SEOβs. π
Thanks, Dean
That was the point behind starting this category on SEO Classics. I am trying to focus on useful tips.
This is a theme that wins my love, thankyou you for your astounding online journal.
A debt of gratitude is for sharing the blog.keep writing web journals such like that it will build our insight
An obligation of appreciation is for sharing your thoughts. It was genuinely incredible and informative. Itβs really strong for me to keep on sharing such thusly.
Hi Bill,
I am glad I found your blog today. I found this interesting as I have seen anchor text links placed in the past that have no relevance to the content on the other side of the link.
I have seen a correlation that when the Anchor Text matches the content on the other side of the link, the time on the website increases.
Thanks for the excellent info.
Never thought of it as confidence. More like relevance. But I see your point and will tweak my mind in that direction. Think it is a great idea!
This is my first visit here and I found a lot of interesting things in your blog especially its discussion. its a really good title. A very useful post.
It feels awesome to read. these are outstanding tips thanks for sharing. Following your blog has helped me learn many new matters in 2022
Good Morning Bill,
I wanted to ask if you think backlinks are still relevant today, and if so how much.
Thanks
Francesco
Improving Linking Confidence will be an interesting topic to discuss. The three most important parts to improve Linking Confidence are internal links, external links, & related article links. Waiting for your upcoming posts on these. Keep it up, Bill.
I appreciate the work you put in Bill. Some of the topics you cover are way above my head but you make them easily understandable.